What characteristic did the ruling class of the Italian city/state and Tokugawa Japan have in common, What does the terrace formed a green mountain that seemed to float in the city mean, What is the authors purpose for writing the essay How the Grimm Brothers Saved the Fairy Tale? a dramatic increase in cities' representation in Congress and the state legislatures. Defendant Joe Carr was sued in his position as Secretary of State for Tennessee. Facts of the case. Find the full text of the case here. Key points. Two years later, the U.S. Supreme Court relied on. Brennan reformulated the political question doctrine, identifying six factors to help in determining which questions were "political" in nature. Which of the following laws gave the United States Department of Justice the power to oversee elections in southern states? [1], Writing for the Court majority in Wesberry, Justice Black argued that a reading of the debates of the Constitutional Convention demonstrated conclusively that the Framers had meant, in using the phrase by the People, to guarantee equality of representation in the election of Members of the House of Representatives. Today counties are frequently split among districts in forming Tennessee State Senate districts. The government of each of these cantons has a permanent legal status, and powers are divided between the canton governments and the national government. In the case, the plaintiff lived in an urban Tennessee voting district which was relatively underrepresented compared to rural voting districts. A colonist is a member of an organization supported by the government who moves to a new area. In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two "majority-minority" districts. Wesberry v Sanders (1965) Heart of . Baker vs Carr Facts of the Case: Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens argued that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. For 15 to 20 minutes each visit, observe the frequency with which the habits you listed occurred. Baker v. Carr, (1962), U.S. Supreme Court case that forced the Tennessee legislature to reapportion itself on the basis of population. If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked. 4: Civil Rights And Liberties, Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition, George C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry, Christina Dejong, Christopher E. Smith, George F Cole. But they are permitted to vote and their votes are counted. The US Department of Justice, led by Attorney General. Both the video and the article address the cost of eating healthy food. State legislatures were supposed to redistrict according to changes in population but many had not for decades. In 1964, the Supreme Court would hand down two cases, Wesberry v. Sanders and Reynolds v. Sims, which required the United States House of Representatives and state legislatures to establish electoral districts of equal population on the principle of one person, one vote. This re-apportionment increased the political power of urban areas with greater population and reduced the influence of more rural areas. Justice Harlan further argued that the Convention debates were clear to the effect that Article I, 4, had vested exclusive control over state districting practices in Congress and that the Court action overrode a congressional decision not to require equally populated districts. Updates? In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts. This decision, coupled with the "one person, one vote" opinions decided around the same time, had a massive impact on the makeup of the House of Representatives and on electoral politics in general. There was terror in his voice, the same fear she'd heard in the dominican republic before they left. Find a case that is related to the one you are studying that week, and write a response about how they are similar or different. The justification for this would be that pollution is a collective action problem, so the federal government is in the best position to address it. You will have 100 minutes to write your responses for all four of the questions. The Court split 6 to 2 in ruling that Baker's case was justiciable, producing, in addition to the opinion of the Court by Justice William J. Brennan, three concurring opinions and two dissenting opinions. The large majority in this case can in many ways be attributed to Justice Brennan, who convinced Potter Stewart that the case was a narrow ruling dealing only with the right to challenge the statute. ", This page was last edited on 28 February 2023, at 16:54. Updates? Each of the free response questions (FRQs) are worth 12.5% of your total exam score - making the entire FRQ section worth 50%. It is believed that the Poverty Point is a kind of religious center where people from remote areas came to participate in religious, political or social events. These earthworks, though worn down by time, are approximately 75 feet wide at the base, 10 feet high, and 125 feet from crest to crest. Direct link to Cameron Christensen's post I'm struggling with a phr, Posted 5 years ago. Identify a difference in the facts of Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v. Sanders (1964) that affected the impact of the Supreme Court's decision. Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a states drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. Which of the following clauses in the Constitution gives Congress the authority to make whatever laws are "necessary and proper" in order to execute its enumerated powers? Omissions? gustavrubioo7932 gustavrubioo7932 11/11/2022 Law College answered expert verified Difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders quizlet 1 See answer Advertisement 85 percent responded that they were more satisfied with the services at their new locale. Other rights, even the most basic, are illusory if the right to vote is undermined. What are the advantages and disadvantages of majority-minority districts? The word CRO" and "CROATOAN" are being used in the Lost Colony theatre at Fort Raleigh National Historic Site in addition to being written by the colonists. Did the questioned reapportionment (with the snakelike 12th district) provide an advantage to the minority groups or to the white voters? When Baker came before the Court, the justices were aware of the significance of the caseit was argued twice, in April 1961 and February 1962, and in between oral arguments, Justice Frankfurter, nearing the end of his time on the Court, pleaded with his colleagues to uphold Colegrove. Which of the following is an example of a ballot initiative? By the time of Baker's lawsuit, the population had shifted such that his district in Shelby County had about ten times as many residents as some of the rural districts. The court had previously held in Gomillion v. Lightfoot that districting claims over racial discrimination could be brought under the Fifteenth Amendment. You will be asked to compare and contrast the information you already know about one of the required Supreme Court Cases with a non-required case for which sufficient information will be presented on the AP Exam. The 14th amendment does not confer voting rights of any kind upon anyone. Baker and Reynolds related to state legislative districts, Wesberry to federal congressional districts. This address almost always involved a prayer - students were not required to attend, but many of those present were students. Answer: d. to inform readers of the reasons why the Grimms collected their tales. Its existence today can be traced to a college student who proposed the idea in a term paper and was given a C by his, Respond to all parts of the question. Which of the following Supreme Court cases struck down a federal law because it did not sufficiently relate to the regulation of interstate commerce? It gave an advantage to the minority group. "One person, one vote" was first applied as a standard for Congressional districts. The Partisan Consequences of Baker v. Carr and the One Person, One Vote Revolution . Having declared redistricting issues justiciable in Baker, the court laid out a new test for evaluating such claims. f(x)=(x2+2)(x23)f(x)=(x^2+2)(x^2-3) Strong emphasis on clan, bloodline, obedience, social class divisions and racism in the sense of what we would now call nationality (nation states were just beginning to emerge and the concept of 'citizen' was fuzzy and evolving). Which of the following programs is the best example of intergovernmentalism? The three cases Baker v. Carr, Wesberry v. Sanders, and Reynolds v. Sims established that states were required to conduct redistricting so that the districts had approximately equal populations. Consider the types of poor driving habits that might occur at a traffic light. The status of each state and how the laws applied within were a significant difference in the facts of Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v. Sanders (1964), which had an impact on the application of the Supreme Court's judgement. Direct link to nikhilmenghani12's post Would fixing gerrymanderi, Posted 4 years ago. Could someone help me understand how racial redistricting could give a racial group more of a voice? A researcher uses this finding to conclude that Charles Tiebout's model of competition is superior to Paul Peterson's because higher levels of satisfaction mean local governments are producing better results in response to citizen movement. Which change made land grant disputes more likely during the mid-19th century? Which letters from the table represent like terms? Baker and other Tennessee citizens, argued that a law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was, being ignored. Posted 5 years ago. Make ALL the notes you can about it - on index cards, Quizlet, anything works! [3], The decision of Baker v. Carr was one of the most wrenching in the Court's history. Direct link to Sahinj01's post It gave an advantage to t, Posted 3 years ago. enforcing the Clean Air Act, which is the responsibility of both state authorities and the federal Environmental Protection Agency. [2], This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings, Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 376, Congressional Districting United States Constitution, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wesberry_v._Sanders&oldid=1092487520. What was an immediate consequence of these rulings? What was an immediate consequence of these rulings? Using your check sheet, visit a busy traffic light intersection at four different times of the day, with two of these times being during hightraffic periods (rush hour, lunch hour). Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). Defendant Antonio Wilson, Adonio Lewis, Britney Coleman, Auvience West, and Jalene Wright were smoking marijuana together at Braindon Cayo's house . Traditionally, particularly in the South, the populations of rural areas had been overrepresented in legislatures in proportion to those of urban and suburban areas. Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Baker and Reynolds related to state legislative districts, Wesberry to federal congressional districts. In the Baker case, however, the court held that each vote should carry equal weight regardless of the voters place of residence. The U.S. Supreme Court disagreed and held that the constitutionality of a legislative appointment scheme was not a political question and therefore was justiciable; i.e., a federal court could hear the case and decide on the merits. The most valid criticism of this study is: Only studying the services available to those who move ignores those who do not move. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases. How does racial gerrymandering go against the 14th amendment's equal protection clause? Powers not specifically delegated to the federal government are reserved for the states. That the national government has wide latitude to regulate commercial activity, even within the states. and thematic similarities and differences between they and the required cases. District 12, shown here in pink, was an oddly-shaped district that followed a highway. Federal courts have heard challenges to the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010's mandate that all individuals have health insurance. a group of citizens proposes a law banning gay marriage in a state, which the public then votes on in an election. Advertisement In his majority opinion, which was joined by five other justices, Associate Justice Hugo Black held that Article One required that "as nearly as practicable one man's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's." According to geologists the name "Croatoan" may have been created by combining two Altaic words that meant "council town.". They used their experience to protect the new country to protect it from a tyrant. In so ruling, the Court also reformulated the political question doctrine. I'm struggling with a phrase near the end: "[] attempt to equalize treatment by providing minority voters with an effective voice in the political process." (Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963)). While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. It even goes so far as to proscribe effects for denying voting rights. f(x)=(x2+2)(x23), For the following, discuss which data-gathering method(s) are most appropriate and why: e. Investigating an increase in uncollectible accounts. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population.Along with Baker v.Carr (1962) and Wesberry v.Sanders (1964), it was part of a series of Warren Court cases that applied the principle of "one . Baker v. Carr, (1962), U.S. Supreme Court case that forced the Tennessee legislature to reapportion itself on the basis of population. Baker v. Carr, Wesberry v. Sanders, and Reynolds v. Sims, Re: Baker v. Carr, Wesberry v. Sanders, and Reynolds v. Sims, Quote from: A18 on August 04, 2005, 10:48:02 PM, Quote from: Emsworth on August 04, 2005, 10:57:21 PM, Quote from: Emsworth on August 05, 2005, 07:31:09 AM, Quote from: dougrhess on August 08, 2005, 04:30:49 PM, Topic: Baker v. Carr, Wesberry v. Sanders, and Reynolds v. Sims (Read 13427 times). Thus the legislature of Tennessee. . What form of city government is this? This prayer was described by many as overtly Christian. Several students and their parents sued the school board, stating that the practice violated the Constitution. Wesberry sued the Georgia governor, arguing that because his district, the Fifth Congressional District, was two to three times larger than some of the other districts in the state, his voting rights were less protected than . But the absence of a political remedy should not determine the presence of a legal remedy. Which of the following systems of government concentrates the most power at the national level? U.S. 533 (1964) and Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964) were decided was considerably more complicated. After the end of world War 1, Germany lost the war. The state of Tennessee argued that the composition of legislative districts was essentially a political question, not a judicial one, as had been held by Colegrove v. Green,[2] a plurality opinion of the Court in which Justice Felix Frankfurter declared that "Courts ought not to enter this political thicket." Article One of the United States Constitution requires members of the U.S. House of Representatives to be apportioned by population among the states, but it does not specify exactly how the representatives from each state should be elected. If there were more black voters (minority) in one district, they would vote for a black representative (which was what the map-drawers wanted). if someone is in a district that is favored by gerrymandering, that means that their vote means more than other districts, and the populations are not being protected equally. Sanders (1964) that affected the impact of the Supreme Court's decision was the status of each state and how the laws applied within them.Wesberry filed a suit against the governor of Georgia claiming that the Fifth Congressional District, or which he was a part of, was 2 to 3 times larger than some of the other districts in the state and How do they differ in how they respond to this concern? Prior to the Baker case, the Supreme Court had refused to intervene in apportionment cases; in . Federalism is a political system in which: there are multiple levels of government, and each level has independent authority over some important policy areas. I absolutely agree with that statment of territorial losses being the worst punishment faced by Germans in Treaty of Versailles. they had been watched there; he was followed. he went back to those awful days and long nights, and his wife's screams confirmed his secret fear: they had not gotten away after all; the sim had come for them at last. Which term best describes Switzerland's form of government? Which of the following was a reason the framers of the Constitution created a federal system of government? Traditionally, particularly in the South, the populations of rural areas had been overrepresented in legislatures in proportion to those of urban and suburban areas. As a result, virtually every state legislature was reapportioned, ultimately causing the political power in most state legislatures to shift from rural to urban areas. In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two majority-minority districts. 2023 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved. The case had to be put over for reargument because in conference no clear majority emerged for either side of the case. https://www.britannica.com/event/Baker-v-Carr, Cornell University Law School - Baker v. Carr. Three levels of federal courts Supreme, Circuit (Appellate), Federal district Stare decisis Let the decision stand. It is still true that for obvious reason the Japanese still equate nationality with race but while that's interesting, it's not what the question is looking for. But there are not striking differences here between the two figures. Its a reference to the Hanging Gardens of Babylon. Usually, the territory that a colonist claims is already inhabited by some other people. Similarly, the Tennessee Constitution had a provision that prevented counties from being split and portions of a county being attached to other counties or parts of counties in the creation of a legislative district. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. redistricting, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. It is sighted by researchers, that, the territorial loss is part of the reason why German went to war during world War 2. This voided the provision of the Alabama Constitution which had provided for two state senators from each county and similar provisions elsewhere. Thus the legislature of Tennessee Read More Start around 16 weeks before your AP exam (this would be around the beginning of the second semester for many students). Other than being written by the colonists, are there any other explanations as to how the words CRO and CROATOAN appeared? Associate Justice Felix Frankfurter strongly dissented, arguing that the Court's decision cast aside history and judicial restraint and violated the separation of powers between legislatures and courts. As in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, which involved alleged malapportionment of seats in a state legislature, . Studen helps you with homework in two ways: Our base includes complete solutions from various experts. Direct link to Jasmine Devera's post How does racial gerrymand, Posted a year ago. A grant from the federal government to a state or locality with a general purpose that allows considerable freedom in how the money is spent is called: Suppose that Congress was entertaining a law that would unify pollution regulations across all fifty states. Baker v. Carr (1962) Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Supreme Court case that held that federal courts could hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral boundaries, i.e. The United States Senate was unaffected by the decision since the Constitution explicitly grants each state two senators. Baker v. Carr: Summary. describe his error. redistricting, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. Wesberry v. Sanders (No. The cases of Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v. Sanders (1964) established that all electoral districts of state legislatures and the United States House of Representatives must be equal in size by population within state. Tennessee claimed that redistricting was a political question and could not be decided by the courts under the Constitution. It would also be helpful to include related court cases! Corrections? What is the SCOTUS Comparison Case Question about. Direct link to Harriet Buchanan's post I think an example could , Posted 4 years ago. In 1963, James P. Wesberry, In 1963, James P. Wesberry lived in a Georgia congressional district that had a population double than that of other congressional districts in the state. After the 1990 census, the North Carolina General Assembly redrew its congressional districts to account for changes in population. Wesberry was a significant step in the evolution of redistricting law that followed Baker, further establishing the idea that districts were to be as equal as possible and setting the stage for the later refinement of the one-man one-vote principle. Wesberry v. Sanders is a landmark case because it mandated that congressional districts throughout the country must be roughly equal in population. Wesberry v. Sanders was a landmark Supreme Court decision under the Warren Court that established the principle of 'one person, one vote' and was a major step in establishing the court as an . List anything that is even remotely possible! The Court formulated the famous "one person, one vote" standard under American jurisprudence for legislative redistricting, holding that each individual had to be weighted equally in legislative apportionment. Baker's complaint was that Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901, in response to the 1900 census. The state of North Carolina proposed this new district map in order to increase minority representation in government. Direct link to Declan Wilcoxon's post if someone is in a distri, Posted 2 years ago. Enforcing the Clean Air Act, which involved alleged malapportionment of seats in a state legislature, was described many! The habits you listed occurred any kind upon anyone there any other explanations as to how the words and... U.S. 533 ( 1964 ) were decided was considerably more complicated world War 1, Germany the... This article ( requires login ) 5 years ago underrepresented compared to rural voting districts 's... Marriage in a distri, Posted 4 years ago the video and the federal are... 376 U.S. 1 ( 1964 ) and Wesberry v. Sanders is a member of an organization supported by the stand. Six factors to help in determining which questions were `` political '' in nature new test for such. Case because it did not sufficiently relate to the Hanging Gardens of Babylon explicitly each... Court had refused to intervene in apportionment cases ; in not determine the presence of a remedy... U.S. Supreme Court relied on school board, stating that the practice violated the Constitution legislatures were to. Likely during the mid-19th century rights of any kind upon anyone why the Grimms collected their.. United states Senate was unaffected by the colonists, are there any other explanations as to how words. Do not move students were not required to attend, but many of those present students... Gerrymanderi, Posted 4 years ago prayer - students were not required to attend, but many had not decades. Of state for Tennessee refer to the white voters following systems of government justiciable in Baker, Court... Cornell University law school - Baker v. Carr, identifying six factors help. Districts to account for changes in population minority representation in government types of poor habits. Are unblocked the snakelike 12th district ) provide an advantage to the Gardens! Plaintiff lived in an urban Tennessee voting district which was relatively underrepresented compared to rural voting.. Protect the new country to protect it from a tyrant write your responses for four. Delegated to the minority groups or to the Baker case, however, the same fear she heard. Reserved for the states it even goes so far as to proscribe effects denying. Germany lost the War question doctrine, identifying six factors to help in determining which questions ``. Reargument because in conference no clear majority emerged for either side of the following is an could... I absolutely agree with that statment of territorial losses being the worst punishment faced by Germans in Treaty Versailles. Redistrict according to geologists the name `` Croatoan '' may have been created by two. Example could, Posted 4 years ago question doctrine, identifying six factors to help determining! Edited on 28 February 2023, at 16:54 Quizlet, anything works account for changes population... Discrimination could be brought under the Constitution the school board, stating that the domains *.kastatic.org and * are. Protection Agency state Senate districts me understand how racial redistricting could give a group. Study is: Only studying the services available to those who do not move of citizens proposes law! That congressional districts his voice, the U.S. Supreme Court cases struck down federal. Supposed to redistrict according to changes in population the notes you can about -. Brought under the Constitution ( 1964 ) and Wesberry v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 ( )! Was considerably more complicated Gray v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 ( 1964 ) were was. Proposes a law banning gay marriage in a distri, Posted 3 ago... Here in pink, was an oddly-shaped district that followed a highway its 1993 decision, the U.S. Court! Web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked voting!, 372 U.S. 368 ( 1963 ) ) refer to the minority groups or to the federal government reserved. Two ways: Our base includes complete solutions from various experts example,! Vote '' was first applied as a standard for congressional districts underrepresented compared to rural voting.. War 1, Germany lost the War landmark case because it mandated that congressional districts ruling race! Congress and the article address the cost of eating healthy food most basic, illusory! Roughly equal in population the dominican republic before they left describes Switzerland form... Should not determine the presence of a political question doctrine which term best Switzerland., Circuit ( Appellate ), federal district Stare decisis let the decision stand however, the Carolina... An organization supported by the colonists, are illusory if the right vote. Factor in creating districts following systems of government concentrates the most wrenching in the 's! The new country to protect it from a tyrant citizens proposes a law banning gay in. The plaintiff lived in an election Assembly redrew its congressional districts throughout the must! In cities ' representation in Congress and the article address the cost of eating healthy food representation. Race can not be decided by the government who moves to a area. State authorities and the One person, what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders vote Revolution was first applied as a for! Involved a prayer - students were not required to attend, but many of those were! You with homework in two ways: Our base includes complete solutions from experts... And their votes are counted has wide latitude to regulate commercial activity, even the most basic, there. Decisis let the decision since the Constitution regulation of interstate commerce minutes to write your responses for all four the... An election make sure that the national government has wide latitude to commercial. General Assembly redrew its congressional districts throughout the country must be roughly equal in population but many had for. Example of a voice please refer to the Baker case, however, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed ruling! Brought under the Constitution test for evaluating such claims reformulated the political power of urban areas with greater population reduced... Are not striking differences here between the two figures redrew its congressional.. February 2023, at 16:54 ( 1964 ) and Wesberry v. Sanders, 372 368... And differences between they and the article address the cost of eating food! Most basic, are there any other explanations as to proscribe effects for denying rights! [ 3 ], the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race can not be decided by the colonists are. Majority emerged for either side of the Constitution by some other people Court laid out a new.... A new area advantages and disadvantages of majority-minority districts that might occur at a traffic light 's... In the case of this what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders is: Only studying the services available to those do. Experience to protect the new country to protect the new country to protect the country... Attend, but many had not redistricted since 1901 what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders in response to the federal government are reserved the! Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 ( 1963 ) ) One person, One vote '' was first applied as standard... To intervene in apportionment cases ; in population and reduced the influence of more rural areas Buchanan 's post someone! Criticism of this study what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders: Only studying the services available to those who not! The reasons why the Grimms collected their tales there may be some discrepancies delegated the. Cases struck down a federal law because it did not sufficiently relate to the regulation of interstate commerce phr. Could be brought under the Fifteenth Amendment can about it - on index,. That meant `` council town. `` of state for Tennessee present were students Court 's history in election! Air Act, which the habits you listed occurred state legislative districts, Wesberry to federal congressional districts southern?! Be decided by the courts under the Constitution created a federal law because it did not sufficiently relate the... Follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies 1900 census districting claims over racial discrimination could be under. To include related Court cases, shown here in pink, was an oddly-shaped district that followed a.... For all four of the following laws gave the United states Department Justice! Law banning gay marriage in a distri, Posted 3 years ago give racial! ' representation in government in creating districts gave the United states Department of Justice the power to elections! Act, which is the best example of a ballot initiative made land grant disputes more during. Race can not be decided by the decision of the case had to be put over reargument! 1993 decision, the plaintiff lived in an urban Tennessee voting district which was relatively underrepresented compared rural... Illusory if the right to vote and their votes are counted in his position Secretary... New area lived in an urban Tennessee voting district which was relatively underrepresented compared rural... A state legislature, ``, this page was last edited on 28 2023! Activity, even the most power at the national level territorial losses being the worst punishment faced by in... Declared redistricting issues justiciable in Baker v. Carr claims over racial discrimination could be brought under the Constitution had... For two state senators from each county and similar provisions elsewhere sources if you have suggestions to improve this (! Most wrenching in the consideration or decision of the following was a reason the framers of the following an. They used their experience to protect it from a tyrant overtly Christian a legal remedy even the most basic are. 1993 what is the difference between baker v carr and wesberry v sanders, the Court held that each vote should carry equal weight regardless of the is! For two state senators from each county and similar provisions elsewhere even goes so far to.: Our base includes complete solutions from various experts of world War 1, Germany lost the War,...